I have a deep, and primal hate for the phrase “fake it until you make it”. I haven’t spent a lot of time actually trying to define why I dislike the phrase so much, as I don’t think that knowing actually offers much value over the long term. However I can speculate a bit on what my intuition tells on the matter.
First and foremost, I know that I associate the phrase with flippant advocates of this mindset that is presented as almost defiantly insincere. Anyone that knows me is distinctly aware that I am pathologically averse to insincerity. Every warning alarm I have will trigger in the presence of it, and I am generally a well-functioning sincerity radar supported by a healthy dash of general skepticism and mistrust.
In parallel to that however, and with perhaps a touch of pedantry sprinkled in, is the view that the phrase is factually and functionally inaccurate. From a fortune cookie standpoint it works fine, but I am inclined to quibble a bit about the details specifically in regards to how the phrase is intended.
The less solid of my issues surrounds the use of the word “fake” in respect to knowledge and aptitude. You can certainly misrepresent. You can obfuscate. You can pretend. You can even guess. But I am dubious if you can actually “fake” these, especially aptitude. In order to present something as genuine that is not, you need something to present. If you appropriate someone else’s work as your own, the aptitude / knowledge involved is not fake, it is real. It is simply not YOUR aptitude… just your assholery.
Anyhow, I believe the core issue I have is with the overall concept itself.
Fake it until you make it.
If you do not know something, and you engage in the process of obtaining or achieving such a thing, you are learning. By this logic we are all faking until we are making, and I take enough exception to this that I took the time to post a meandering ramble about it.
The point of all this is that I have grown to prefer a much more noble, and much more accurate phrase to replace the phrase that must not be named, and thankfully it works on a fortune cookie too:
Aspire to, and acquire through…
I try very hard to surround myself with people that posses qualities that I admire… That I aspire to. And it is through this exposure to them that I can learn from them and (hopefully) acquire those same traits or skills. I choose a life of constant improvement and betterment (mostly as a way to channel my neurotic need to fix things), and while I may fall short more often that I would want, I do not feel it is accurate or helpful to define any of this as “faking”.
Perhaps both phrases represent two sides of the same coin, ultimately defined by the sincerity or motivation driving them. A yin and yang view of the same fundamental concept. I can concede that as a possibility. But in the end, I prefer to align with nobility of genuine growth through aspiring and acquiring than to embrace the dis-ingenuousness of fakery.